Software security you can build, test, and prove
Three practices that cover the software, the program that produces it, and the engineering work of improving both.
Start a ConversationAssess, Identify Gaps, Implement, Validate
Engagements are scoped and bought individually. They are designed to connect, so an assessment can flow straight into the work it identifies rather than stopping at a report.
Assess
Test the product and examine the program behind it, including the evidence sitting behind each control.
Identify Gaps
Separate what is missing from what exists but cannot be demonstrated. Both are gaps, and they need different fixes.
Implement
Build the controls, automation, and architecture changes in your stack, with tests and handover.
Validate
Re-test, re-examine, and confirm the control operates. A gap closes on evidence, not on assertion.
Application & AI Security
Find and reduce risk in the software itself.
Testing and review for applications, APIs, and AI-backed features, run against a threat model and closed out with a verification pass.
- Application Security Assessments
- AI and LLM Security Reviews
- Penetration Testing
- Threat Modeling
- Security Architecture Reviews
- Source Code Reviews
- Software Supply-Chain Reviews
- Adversarial Security Testing
Software Security Assurance
Build a defensible software-security program and prove that it operates.
Assessment, evidence, and validation for the program behind the software. Starts with the Software Security Evidence Readiness Assessment.
- Software Security Evidence Readiness Assessment
- Secure Development Program Assessment
- Secure SDLC Program Design
- NIST SSDF Readiness
- OWASP SAMM Assessment and Operationalization
- Customer Security Assurance Readiness
- Regulatory Software-Security Readiness
- Secure Software Attestation Readiness
- Software-Security Governance
- Product Security Program Development
- Executive and Board Reporting
- Fractional Product Security Advisory
- Internal Assessment and Validation
- Executive and Engineering Workshops
Security Engineering
Turn security recommendations into working controls.
The implementation half of the work: pipelines, automation, architecture, and remediation, built in your stack and handed over with documentation.
- DevSecOps Implementation
- CI/CD Security
- Security Automation
- Secure Architecture Design
- Remediation Engineering
- SBOM Automation
- Software Supply-Chain Controls
- Security Tool Integration
- Secure Application Engineering
- Custom Internal Security Tooling
Who We Work With
The work suits organizations where software is the product or sits in the critical path, and it usually starts with one of the roles below.
Organizations
- Software companies and SaaS providers
- AI companies and teams shipping LLM-backed features
- Technology organizations with software in the critical path
- Product manufacturers with software or firmware in the product
- Companies selling software into enterprises or government
- Organizations affected by software-security regulation
Who usually brings us in
- CISO, CTO, and CIO
- VP and Director of Engineering
- Head of Product Security or Application Security
- Security engineering and platform leadership
- Product leadership answering customer security reviews
- Founders and executives preparing for diligence
Frequently Asked Questions
A few of the questions we hear most often, and how we tend to answer them.
Not sure which one you need?
Describe the situation and we will tell you which practice fits, including when the answer is that you do not need us yet.
Start a Conversation